Announcement

Job Posting

The University of Baltimore is advertising a position in its School of Public and International Affairs for a tenure track assistant professor.

Candidates for this position must hold a Ph.D. at the time of appointment in the Conflict Management field, broadly construed to include conflict analysis and resolution, conflict management, conflict transformation, peace and conflict studies, peacekeeping operations, peace education, or a similar course of study. Applicants with degrees in related fields of study appropriate to the Conflict Management discipline (e.g. political science, international relations, public administration, public policy, and allied social science disciplines) with expertise in the above-mentioned areas are also encouraged to apply. Diverse methodological and regional areas of expertise, both domestic and international, will be considered. Candidates should have a record of scholarly activities appropriate to the rank of Assistant Professor (tenure-track) and demonstrate the potential for quality university instruction and service to the profession and the university.  Candidates who are A.B.D. will be considered pending successful completion of their dissertation defense by August 15, 2017.

The successful candidate will be joining the well-established graduate program in Negotiations and Conflict Management (CNCM), an applied, cross-disciplinary Masters of Science program in the School of Public and International Affairs. The CNCM program is designed to expose students to conflict management in a variety of settings from the interpersonal to the international. The program’s 42-credit curriculum is delivered through a series of applied courses that enable students to examine the link between conflict management theory and practice and prepares them for post-graduate success in a variety of settings in which conflict management skills are necessary.

More information on this position, can be found here.

Justiciability of the Right to Education

Image

During this session of the UN Human Rights Council (May 27 to June 14), Kishore Singh, the UN Special Rapporteur for Right to Education, presented a report that describes the ways in which the right to education (which is characterized as an “economic, social, and cultural right” in UN treaties) is  justiciable.  In the report, he also encourages States to promote access to courts for people who claim violations of the right to education.

Many member-states supported the recommendations in his report during the Human Rights Council meeting as you can see from this video.  Portugal even introduced a resolution calling for States to create mechanisms to make education rights more justifiable.

The United States representative, however, expressed concern in regard to several aspects of the report.  The representative, for example, said “while quality of education is the highest of ideals and something we strive for in our schools daily, we do not agree with the phrasing in this report implying that existing rights include quality education.”  This statement comes at a time when we are seeing a crises in our public education system across the nation.  We essentially have a dual public school system— some schools provide quality education while others do not.  Several cities are closing schools (in many cases in minority communities).  Chicago’s Board of Education is closing over 10% of its public schools effective at the end of this school year.  Additionally, the United States representative disagreed with Mr. Singh’s interpretation of a 2003 New York Court of Appeals decision that teacher quality is justiciable.

I had an opportunity to participate in a side-event during this Human Rights Council session on promoting justiciability of the right to education by using indicators in litigation.