STUDYING WAR CRIMES:
The ethics of re-presenting mass violence in research
When do descriptions of harm become academic sensationalism rather than re-presentations of violent materialities? Can academic interest and engagement in mass harm ever avoid voyeurism? How can sensational violence be ethically re-presented in research? Across disciplines theorizing mass harm, a consensus is emerging cautioning against sensationalism in re-presentations of perpetrators, victims, crimes, and sufferings, seeing detailed descriptions of violence as academic voyeurism. Yet, how comfortable a read can research that has violent profusion at its core become, before the distance created by language becomes an ethical – and analytical – challenge in its own right?
This edited volume invites experienced scholars to address thoroughly the ethics of doing research on mass harm in general, and of re-presenting and describing mass violence, harmdoing, trauma, and suffering in their own research in particular. Drawing on a range of methodological approaches and empirical cases, the book will address how mass violence and war crimes are brought into research – both as an ethical, a sensational, and an analytical matter.
We ask contributors to reflect on their re-presentations of mass crimes, violence and justice, seeing re-presentations both as an issue to do with individual and disciplinary research ethics but also as a matter to do with power and material structures of academic knowledge production. The purpose is to encourage active engagement with a research ethics that goes beyond ‘procedural ethic;’ to expand the discussion on responsibility for the stories we hear, read, analyze, and re-tell; and to address in-depth the ethics of listening, seeing, and telling in research on mass violence and war crimes.
The book will be relevant for all researchers who wish to engage ethically with the study of mass violence and war crimes.
We invite abstracts that explore the ethics of re-presenting mass violence in research.
Abstracts may also cater specifically to:
- The ethics of caring, seeing, listening and re-presenting
- Selection and exclusion: whose stories are told?
- Understanding harm/understanding as harm
- “Thick descriptions” and sensationalism
- Breaking the silence vs silence as choice
- Emotions, positionality, and reflexivity
Abstract of no more than 500 words to be submitted by November 30th, 2018 to editors at email@example.com. We only accept original contributions and the abstract needs to clearly demonstrate the chapter’s contribution to the volume.
Please include a 150-200 word bio highlighting your affiliation, work experience and credentials in the field of war and mass violence research.
After an initial screening and by December 15th, 2018, editors will invite 8 contributors to develop their abstract into a full chapter (5-7000 words) to be submitted by April 15th 2019. We will apply for funding for a lunch-to-lunch workshop for contributors in May 2019. The final submission date for full chapters will be in August, 2019.
Routledge (Taylor&Francis Group) initiated our work with this collection, and has expressed a strong interest in publishing the book.
About the editors:
Sladjana Lazic is a post-doctoral researcher at the Center for Peace Studies (CPS) at the Arctic University of Norway (UiT). She holds a PhD in Political Science from the Norwegian University for Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway, on victims’ perspectives on transitional justice and legitimacy.
Anette Bringedal Houge holds a PhD in Criminology and Sociology of Law from the University of Oslo on conflict-related sexual violence, perpetrator re-presentations, and international criminal justice. She has published her research in e.g., Aggression and Violent Behavior, British Journal of Criminology and Criminology and Criminal Justice. Anette is the Head of Humanitarian Needs and Analysis at the Norwegian Red Cross.